EFCC seeks arrest of Ex-NDDC boss, Omatsuli over N3.6bn Fraud

A Federal High Court sitting in Ikoyi, Lagos has been asked by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, EFCC, to issue a warrant of arrest to compel a former Executive Director on Projects, Niger Delta Development Commission, NDDC, Tuoyo Omatsuli to attend his trial over an alleged N3.6bn fraud.

Omatsuli, alongside Francis Momoh, Don Parker Properties Limited and Building Associates Limited, were initially standing trial on an alleged case of conspiracy and money laundering to the tune of N3.645billion before Justice Saliu Saidu of the Federal High Court, Ikoyi, Lagos, now retired.

The defendants had pleaded not guilty to the charges preferred against them.

The EFCC, after calling 16 prosecution witnesses, subsequently closed its case against the defendants.

However, the defendants filed a no-case submission, which was heard on October 12, 2020.

In his ruling on November 11, 2020, Justice Saidu had discharged the first defendant, Omatsuli, saying, “I have gone through the charge preferred against the defendants as well as the evidence of all the 16 prosecution witnesses and I found no reason for the first defendant to enter the defence.”

Consequently, EFCC appealed the discharge of the former NDCC boss.

READ ALSO: Actress jailed 6 months for spraying, stepping on new Naira notes

On April 13, 2022, a three-man panel of the Court of Appeal, Lagos Division, upheld the appeal of the EFCC, and dismissed the ruling of the trial court.

The judgment delivered by Justice Festus Ogbuinya held that the ruling of the lower court dated November 11, 2020, discharging the respondent, Omatsuli, of the money laundering charges “is hereby set aside and he shall enter into his defence accordingly on the same counts.”

The appellate court, however, discharged Omatsuli on counts 27, 28 and 29 of the charge.

In the course of the trial, Justice Saidu retired and the matter was subsequently re-assigned to Justice Daniel Osiagor.

However, at the resumed sitting on Wednesday, counsel to the 2nd defendant, Norrison Quakers, SAN, informed the court that Omatsuli was absent in court because he had an appeal pending before the Supreme Court.

“The first defendant is on appeal at the Supreme Court. A no- case submission filed by the 1st defendant before the Federal High Court was upheld and EFCC appealed the decision.

“This decision was, however, reversed at the appellate court and the no-case submission dismissed.

The defendants were ordered to enter into their defence. Dissatisfied with the ruling of the Appeal Court, the 1st defendant appealed to the Supreme Court and the matter is yet to be determined,” he said.

He also told the court that the 1st defendant was not aware of Wednesday’s hearing because he was not represented by a counsel at the last proceedings.

READ ALSO: Ecobank vs Anchorage dispute: Court rules on application March 13

Responding, prosecution counsel, Ekele Iheanacho, said: “At the previous sitting, sometime in November 2023, the matter came up for arraignment, and a counsel appeared on behalf of the 1st defendant.

“The court then asked us to choose a date for arraignment. On that basis, I didn’t ask for a bench warrant against the defendant.

“There is no stay of proceedings in the law, according to the Administration of the Criminal Justice Act, ACJA.

“The pendency of the appeal does not prevent the proceedings at the Federal High Court from going on.”

While making reference to S352 of the ACJA, Iheanacho, therefore, applied for a bench warrant against Omatsuli.

Justice Osiagor disagreed with Iheanacho that the 1st defendant was aware of today’s hearing and, therefore, ordered that he be put on notice.

The case was adjourned to March 22, 2024, for re-arraignment and trial.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

%d bloggers like this: